Editorial Standards

Our mission is to provide busy clinicians with accurate, highly relevant summaries of newly published medical literature. To maintain the highest level of trust, we adhere to the following standards:

• Selection Criteria: We source articles directly from PubMed, prioritizing high-quality study designs (Randomized Controlled Trials, Meta-Analyses, Systematic Reviews, and major Observational Studies) that have direct implications for clinical practice. We actively filter out low-impact or highly speculative research.
• Relevance: An article is selected for summary only if it answers a clinical question, updates a guideline, or provides significant new evidence for our core specialties.
• Summary Structure: Every article is presented in a standardized "60-second" format that guarantees brevity and consistency. It must include the study design, key findings, a practical clinical takeaway, and—critically—the study's primary limitations.
• Claims & Tone: We do not sensationalize findings. Summaries must use measured, clinical language. We strictly avoid paraphrasing that alters the original intent of the authors or overstates the statistical significance of the results.