Survival outcome of VATS compared with open lobectomy for lung cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Quick Take: VATS lobectomy for lung cancer delivers survival outcomes equivalent to open lobectomy, solidifying its role as a preferred surgical approach when technically feasible.
š” Clinical Impact
- Reinforces current practice by validating that minimally invasive VATS does not compromise long-term oncologic survival compared to open surgery.
- Supports continued patient selection for VATS, leveraging its known benefits of reduced pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery without sacrificing efficacy.
š Evidence Breakdown
- Evidence Grade: 9/10
- Analysis: An individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials confirms similar survival outcomes between VATS and open lobectomy for lung cancer, offering the highest level of evidence to support the non-inferiority of the minimally invasive approach.
𩺠Practice Recommendation
Continue to prioritize VATS lobectomy for lung cancer when technically feasible. This robust evidence supports its equivalent long-term survival while capitalizing on the established advantages of minimally invasive surgery.